JARVIS WARNS OF DANGER AS HELIOS ARTIFACTS EMERGE And I’m inclined to believe him. You heard me right. I might have leaned Resistance in the past, but I’m back to where I started. Truthseeker. And you have to look for truth everywhere -- even Roland Jarvis. (By the way, what’s going on with him? I’m hearing rumors. So here’s where we are. We’ve got a Consortium and Arifacts. Consortium of who? Artifacts from what? Some thoughts: Think back almost a year. The same day (date?). Carrie Campbell makes the sacrifice and Klue stares into the glyphs and changes forever (forever? Will it be forever?) And what of the Shapers? What do they want? Were they protecting us from ourselves? And what of Ada? At this point, what is the difference between her and a Shaper? And you’re hearing this from the guy who coded her.
They'll probably reshare it soon.
ReplyDeleteOr may be not.
ReplyDeleteSeemed to me from the start more interested in protecting the freedom of AI in spite of every precaution. If there was a way to manage the artificial intelligences directly by thought, it would certainly be a horrible invasion of privacy of those poor unfortunate synthetic consciences.
The temptation to use a direct link to the data out there with a direct interface to the brain is huge.
ReplyDeleteAt what price?
Even before this direct interface how can you know what are your thought, your ideas and what thoughts and ideas were implanted in your mind from the outside through some manipulation.
Now think that you are giving someone from the outside a direct link into your mind. Priceless.
Imagine thinking about what book you want to read and you will have access to your favorite todo list software but in it, there will be an ad from Amazon.
Now take it a step further. What will ADA or a Techthulu do with this kind of direct link to a human brain? What ideas will be implanted? What use can it have of the human brain?